Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This framework demonstrates improved NVH diagnosis in EVs with smartphones, suggesting practical utilities for automotive applications.
This paper presents a physics-informed, tacholess pipeline for smartphone-grade Noise, Vibration, and Harshness (NVH) diagnosis in electric vehicle powertrains. A configurable generator synthesizes labeled signals with order components (1×/2×/3×), AM/FM modulation, sub-harmonics, impact-driven ring-down near resonance, and realistic white/pink/ambient noise at phone bandwidths. A ridge-guided harmonic comb recenters orders without a tachometer and splits tonal from residual content. Interpretable features—order-invariant ratios (E2×/E1×, SB1/E1×, E0.5×/E1×) and residual descriptors (band-power, kurtosis, cepstrum/WPT)—feed light-compute models. A reproducible benchmark stresses SNR (−5…+10 dB), RPM profiles (ramp/steps/cycles), and simulated domain shift; parameter-to-feature analyses (with Sobol sensitivity and a delta-method identifiability proxy) quantify measurability under phone constraints. Across a five-fold CV, tacholess order tracking increases tonal SNR by ≥+6 dB and yields macro-F1 ≈ 0.86 with Random Forest, while ordinal severity achieves QWK ≈ 0.81 (ECE ≈ 0.06) and regression attains MAE ≈ 0.12 (R2 ≈ 0.78). All code, datasets, figures, and tables regenerate from fixed seeds with one-command builds; a data card and a sim-to-real guide are included. The result is an open, low-compute standard that couples reproducibility with physics-aligned interpretability, providing a practical baseline for EV NVH diagnostics with smartphones and a common ground for future field validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benavides et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: