Experiments revealed avoidance behaviour in crows towards various owl decoys, suggesting complexity influences their reactions.
Corvids exhibit avoidance behaviour when foraging in the presence of potentially risky stimuli, yet it remains unclear how stimulus characteristics influence the strength of such responses. In this paper, we present wild-caught Large-billed Crows (Corvus macrorhynchos) with five conditions: no visual stimulus, a cardboard box (non-biological, stationary), an immobile owl decoy (biological, stationary), a continuous-motion owl decoy (biological, moving), and a sensor-activated-motion owl decoy (biological, moving, and sudden). Avoidance was quantified using feeding latency, landing frequency, total time spent in the feeding area, and food consumption. Compared with the condition with no visual stimulus, the presence of any visual stimulus elicited increased latency, indicating that crows detect and respond to objects near food. Among the four objects, the sensor-activated-motion owl decoy produced stronger avoidance responses of the crows than the non-biological and stationary object (cardboard box). This indicates that they evaluate not only the presence of an object but also its motion characteristics and/or perceived biological cues when adjusting their foraging behaviour. Although sample size and individual variation impose limitations, these findings suggest that both the presence of visual stimuli and/or the complexity of their appearance play key roles in shaping avoidance behaviour in corvids.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fujioka et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: