PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 9, 2025Nursing Reports3 citationsOpen Access

Growth and Adaptation of Newly Graduated Nurses Based on Duchscher’s Stages of Transition Theory and Transition Shock Model: A Longitudinal Quantitative Study

View Full Paper
LCLynette CusackLMLoren MadsenJDJudy Boychuk Duchscher

Key Points

  • This research investigates the development of professional roles among new graduate nurses through the stages of transition.
  • Longitudinal quantitative study design conducted in a major Australian health service
  • Administered a customized 75-item questionnaire at three transition points
  • Assessed four domains: Responsibilities, Role Orientation, Relationships, Knowledge and Confidence
  • Used descriptive statistics, PCA, chi-square tests, and multinomial logistic regression for analysis.
  • PCA confirmed a four-factor structure explaining 62% of variance
  • Significant improvements in clinical decision-making and emotional regulation across transition stages
  • Regression analysis highlighted role confusion and workplace support as strong predictors of transition stage
  • Most new graduate nurses exhibited enhanced autonomy and confidence by Stage 3.

Abstract

Background: The transition from student to registered nurse is a vulnerable period characterised by emotional strain, role ambiguity, and transition shock. Although Graduate Nurse Transition Programs (GNTPs) aim to strengthen early practice readiness, few evaluations use longitudinal, theory-informed approaches or validated tools. Aim: To examine the professional role development of new graduate nurses (NGNs) across three transition stages within a major Australian health service. Design and Methods: A longitudinal quantitative study guided by Duchscher’s Stages of Transition Theory and the Transition Shock Model. A customised 75-item questionnaire—adapted from the Professional Role Transition Risk Assessment Instrument and the Professional and Graduate Capability Framework—was administered at three transition points (March 2020–March 2021). Four domains were assessed: Responsibilities, Role Orientation, Relationships, and Knowledge and Confidence. Descriptive statistics, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), chi-square tests, and multinomial logistic regression identified developmental patterns and predictors of transition stage. Results: PCA supported a four-factor structure consistent with the theoretical domains, explaining 62% of variance. Significant stage-based improvements were found in clinical decision-making (RS6, p = 0.005), managing pressure (RS11, p = 0.003), leadership perception (RO5, p = 0.001), and emotional regulation (RL20, p < 0.001). Regression analysis identified role confusion (RS7, χ2 = 18.112, p = 0.001), leadership potential (RL1, χ2 = 25.590, p < 0.001), workplace support (RL16, χ2 = 12.760, p = 0.013), and critical thinking confidence (KN13, χ2 = 10.858, p = 0.028) as strong predictors of transition stage. By Stage 3, most NGNs demonstrated increased autonomy, confidence, and professional integration. A coordinator-to-graduate ratio of 1:12 facilitated personalised mentorship. Conclusions: Findings provide robust evidence for theoretically grounded GNTPs. Tailored interventions—such as early mentorship, mid-stage stress support, and late-stage leadership development—can enhance role clarity, confidence, and workforce sustainability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cusack et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69401d682d562116f28f919ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15120437
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper