PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 9, 2025Bioengineering5 citationsOpen Access

Artificial Intelligence in Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema: A Narrative Review

View Full Paper
AJAnđela JukićJPJosip PavanMKMiro Kalauz

Key Points

  • This review examines the applications of artificial intelligence in diabetic retinopathy and macular edema.
  • Narrative search of PubMed and Google Scholar
  • Screened 300 records for eligibility
  • Evaluated AI algorithms for detection, classification, prognosis, and treatment monitoring
  • Guided by PRISMA 2020
  • 60 articles met inclusion criteria
  • AI algorithms showed sensitivities up to 96% and specificities up to 98% for detecting diabetic retinopathy
  • Models trained on optical coherence tomography data achieved AUC values exceeding 0.90
  • Autonomous AI tools have received regulatory approval and are used in clinical practice

Abstract

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME) remain major causes of vision loss among working-age adults. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning, has gained attention in ophthalmic imaging, offering opportunities to improve both diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. This review examined applications of AI in DR and DME published between 2010 and 2025. A narrative search of PubMed and Google Scholar identified English-language, peer-reviewed studies, with additional screening of reference lists. Eligible articles evaluated AI algorithms for detection, classification, prognosis, or treatment monitoring, with study selection guided by PRISMA 2020. Of 300 records screened, 60 met the inclusion criteria. Most reported strong diagnostic performance, with sensitivities up to 96% and specificities up to 98% for detecting referable DR on fundus photographs. Algorithms trained on optical coherence tomography (OCT) data showed high accuracy for identifying DME, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values frequently exceeding 0.90. Several models also predicted anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment response and recurrence of fluid with encouraging results. Autonomous AI tools have gained regulatory approval and have been implemented in clinical practice, though performance can vary depending on image quality, device differences, and patient populations. Overall, AI demonstrates strong potential to improve screening, diagnostic consistency, and personalized care, but broader validation and system-level integration remain necessary.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jukić et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69401d732d562116f28f92b6https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12121342
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper