Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study reveals faculty mentorship positively influences student well-being and retention, suggesting closeness and commitment play significant roles.
Objectives: This study examined the associated between faculty mentor-student relationship quality and student well-being, and whether specific relationship dimensions (closeness, commitment, and complementarity) predicted well-being indicators. Participants and Methods: A total of 146 undergraduate students (age = 21.4, 73% female, 84% white) completed an online survey assessing faculty mentor-student relationship quality and five domains of well-being using validated measures. Data were analyzed using Spearman's correlations and bootstrapped linear regression models. Results: Closeness and complementarity were positively associated with all well-being indicators. Commitment was associated with higher perseverance and engagement. Regression analyses revealed that closeness positively predicted connectedness (p = 0.014), while commitment negatively predicted it (p = 0.019). Other well-being outcomes were not significantly predicted. Conclusion: Faculty mentor relationships are positively associated with student well-being though different dimensions influence well-being in distinct ways. Closeness supports broader connectedness, while high commitment may reflect reliance on mentors in lieu of wider social integration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hathaway et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: