Validation study finds LINNE scoring predicts treatment need for tongue-tie in 12.9% of newborns, indicating its clinical utility.
Background Ankyloglossia may restrict newborn infant’s tongue movements, complicating breastfeeding. However, due to lacking evidence-based guidelines, patient selection for early frenotomy has remained a challenge. The present prospective, observation study validated a scoring aimed to detect infants who required early tongue-tie treatment. It is a part of the Lingual Frenulum in Newborn Infants (LINNE) project, investigating tongue-tie epidemiology along with a randomized treatment trial. Methods Healthy mother-infant-dyads were assessed by independent and mutually blinded study physicians and midwives. They used the LINNE scoring, including: 1. Infant examination using a picture assessment tool for tongue-tie in breastfed babies (TABBY); 2. Maternal breastfeeding experience scoring (MBES), a psychometric testing on acute breastfeeding symptoms; 3. Three anamnestic factors associated with tongue-ties and breastfeeding problems. Validation tests were conducted using the Cronbach alpha for the whole LINNE scoring, and for the subscorings: 1. TABBY: areas under the curve (AUC), multi-rater Fleiss kappa; 2. MBES: content and construct validity and responsiveness tests; 3. Anamnesis: accuracy studies for diagnostic tests. Results Of the studied 556 mother-infant-dyads, 72 (12.9%) infants fulfilled the early tongue-tie treatment criteria. The overall LINNE scoring’s internal consistency was acceptable (alpha = 0.723). The pooled TABBY scoring (n = 1094) accurately detected the need for treatment (AUC = 0.914, 95%CI 0.891–0.938) with moderate inter-rater agreement (kappa = 0.441, 95%CI 0.406–0.477). MBES responsiveness, content, and construct validities reached the required levels. Anamnestic factors had high specificity but fair sensibility for the tongue-tie causing breastfeeding symptoms. Conclusion The LINNE scoring demonstrated moderate inter-rater agreement; however, the accuracy of the TABBY tool was very good with AUC 0.9 for ankyloglossia needing early treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lehtinen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: