Analysis shows rising utilization of stereotactic body radiation therapy in stage I lung cancer, indicating increased use at high-volume centers.
PURPOSE To evaluate utilization trends and survival outcomes of single-fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy (SF-SBRT) for early-stage non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS The National Cancer Database (2006-2021) was queried to identify patients with stage I NSCLC treated with either SF-SBRT or multifraction (MF) SBRT delivered in 3-5 fractions. Patients receiving chemotherapy or surgery were excluded. Utilization trends were assessed using the Cochran-Armitage test. Predictors of SF-SBRT use were evaluated via multivariable logistic regression. Overall survival (OS) was compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS A total of 83,377 patients were identified, of whom 937 (1.1%) received SF-SBRT. The proportion of SF-SBRT rose from 0% in 2006 to 1.6% in 2021 ( P < .0001). The most frequent SF-SBRT prescriptions were 34 Gy (39%), 27 Gy (28%), and 30 Gy (28%); the most frequent MF-SBRT prescriptions were 10 Gy × 5 (42%), 18 Gy × 3 (14%), and 12 Gy × 4 (14%). The proportion of facilities delivering SF-SBRT increased from 0% in 2006 to 11% in 2021 ( P < .0001) and, as of 2021, varied significantly by annual lung SBRT case volume: 6% for centers treating <10 patients, 25% for centers treating 10-19 patients, 41% for centers treating 20-29 patients, and 69% for centers treating ≥30 patients per year. Factors associated with SF-SBRT utilization included smaller tumor size (≤2 cm), treatment at a high-volume center or academic facility, and later year of treatment (all P < .0001). There was no difference in OS between patients treated with SF-SBRT and MF-SBRT ( P = .89). CONCLUSION Utilization of SF-SBRT for stage I NSCLC is increasing, particularly at high-volume and/or academic centers. Yet, its overall utilization remains low despite evidence supporting its safety and efficacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moghanaki et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: