PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 8, 2025The British Journal of Politics and International Relations2 citationsOpen Access

New regulatory scaffolding for the United Kingdom: Brexit, devolution and the Windsor Framework

View Full Paper
LWLisa Claire WhittenDPDavid Phinnemore

Key Points

  • Brexit led to significant changes in regulatory frameworks, specifically affecting Northern Ireland.
  • The departure from the EU complicated existing relationships and calls for better management of devolution.
  • Observational analysis of the UK's regulatory adjustments post-Brexit reveals intricate dynamics involving Ireland.
  • This framework emphasizes the need for sustainable governance amid evolving policy paths post-Brexit.

Abstract

Membership of the European Union had a cohesive regulatory effect on the United Kingdom. Coinciding with devolution, the obligations of European Union membership served as a regulatory scaffolding within which the United Kingdom Government and the United Kingdom devolved governments could pursue their own legislative and policy paths. European Union membership alongside Ireland also facilitated the 1998 Belfast ‘Good Friday’ Agreement, particularly as regards north–south cooperation on the island of Ireland. Brexit therefore raised the prospect of the regulatory scaffolding being removed and so questions about how to manage the regulatory consequences domestically. This article establishes the regulatory effects of European Union membership on the United Kingdom before considering the impact of the post-Brexit United Kingdom–European Union relationship and approaches of the United Kingdom to managing the regulatory effects of withdrawal. It then considers the replacement domestic scaffolding put in place to manage devolution outside the European Union and Northern Ireland’s unique post-Brexit position under the terms of the Windsor Framework.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Whitten et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69401f062d562116f28f9f37https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481251396869
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The changing post‐Brexit UK‐EU relationship and rules‐based global governance2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in Northern Ireland under the Windsor Framework2024
  3. 3Democratic Consent for the Windsor Framework2025
  4. 4Democratic Consent for the Windsor Framework2025
  5. 5UK trade agreements and the double bind of devolved regulatory autonomy: the interplay of external commitments and domestic constraints2026