PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 8, 2025Journal of Computers in Education6 citationsOpen Access

Generative artificial intelligence competency self-efficacy scale for teachers and researchers (GAICS-TR) in higher education

View Full Paper
QXQi XiaYYYiming YangXWXiaojing Weng

Key Points

  • Assessment indicates high self-efficacy in using generative AI among teachers and researchers.
  • The validated competency scale emphasizes four key domains, including teaching and research with generative AI.
  • Validation involved 787 academics from nine universities, with no significant differences by gender in scale components.
  • The findings support the integration of generative AI into higher education practices and professional development.

Abstract

Abstract Academics’ generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) competency is crucial for addressing the transformations it brings to higher education. Existing digital/AI competency frameworks may indirectly cope with AI competency issues needed but often overlook the impact of GenAI technology on research and assessment. Most existing AI competency frameworks for teachers focus on K–12 education, which is not appropriate for higher education. Therefore, this study aims to develop and validate a scale designed to measure GenAI Competency Self-Efficacy for Teachers and Researchers (GAICS-TR) in higher education. The scale is based on our proposed framework driven by literature and includes four domains and nine dimensions. The domains are basic GenAI understanding, teaching with GenAI, research with GenAI, and professional engagement and GenAI. The participants were 787 academics from nine universities. We used confirmatory factor analysis and group comparisons to validate the scale. Personal factors such as gender and age showed no significant differences across the scale components. The findings contribute to policies and research targeting the integration of GenAI into educational practices, as well as teacher professional development in higher education.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xia et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69401f062d562116f28fa0d9https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-025-00373-y
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper