Retrospective cohort analysis reveals distance and insurance type influence access to high-volume surgeons for thyroidectomy in thyroid cancer care.
Background: High-volume thyroid surgeons (HVTS) provide quality care with fewer adverse outcomes, yet access to these surgeons can be challenging. This study aimed to assess factors associated with receiving care from a HVTS for thyroid cancer. Study Design: This retrospective cohort study analyzed adults with thyroid cancer who underwent thyroidectomy in a statewide multi-payor claims registry (2015-2022). Surgeons were classified as high- (>25/year) or low-volume (≤25/year; LVTS). Logistic regression evaluated demographics; distance between home, surgical facility, and closest endocrinologist; and zip code-level census data in association with surgery by a HVTS. Results: Overall, 357 surgeons performed thyroidectomies on 3,839 patients with thyroid cancer: 17 (4.8%) were HVTS and 340 (95.2%) were LVTS. Most thyroidectomies were performed by LVTS (53.9%, n=2,068). Patients treated by HVTS travelled an average of 4.8 miles farther to their treating surgeons (33.7±44.4 miles versus 28.9±44.3 miles to LVTS, p<0.001). Factors significantly (p<0.05) associated with an increased likelihood of treatment by a HVTS included: having Medicare Advantage through a preferred provider organization and living further from their treating surgeon. Patients who were significantly (p<0.05) less likely to have surgery by a HVTS were: male, had Medicare insurance without an Advantage plan, lived in a zip code with low educational attainment, and lived further from an endocrinologist. Conclusion: This study identified several factors independently associated with decreased odds of having thyroidectomy by a HVTS for thyroid cancer treatment in the state of Michigan. These results underscore the continued existence of inequities in access within our healthcare system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jensen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: