Retrospective analysis shows no sex differences in survival outcomes in glioblastoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, suggesting further evaluation in clinical trials.
Background Sex differences in glioblastoma (GBM) are recognized, but their treatment implications remain unclear. Recent preclinical studies have characterized mechanisms of sex-biased anti-tumor immunity in GBM, and have found in murine models that males derive greater survival benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). We evaluated sex differences associated with ICI in GBM patients. Methods We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients with newly diagnosed GBM (nGBM) or recurrent GBM (rGBM) treated with ICI on clinical trials at one institution from 2014 to 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis, univariate and multivariable regression models. Sex-by-treatment interactions were assessed relative to a concurrent reference group treated on non-ICI clinical trials. Results 296 patients with nGBM (58% male, 19% ICI) and 458 patients with rGBM (60% male, 40% ICI) were evaluated. In nGBM, ICI was not associated with sex difference in PFS (HRmale 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.62–2.95; p=0.446; p interaction=0.142) or OS (HRmale 1.15 [0.53–2.53], p=0.722; p interaction=0.438) compared to non-ICI treatment. In rGBM, males receiving ICI had worse OS (HRmale 1.64 [1.09–2.47], p=0.017) and trended towards worse PFS (HRmale 1.41 [0.94–2.11], p=0.095), but sex differences with ICI were not significantly different compared to non-ICI treatment (PFS pinteraction=0.610; OS pinteraction=0.361). No sex differences were observed when all immunotherapies were analyzed collectively. Conclusion In nGBM and rGBM, ICI therapy was not associated with sex difference in PFS or OS. Clinically meaningful sex-based outcome differences may be better understood by prospective evaluation in clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Westergaard et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: