PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 7, 2025Journal of Clinical Oncology8 citationsOpen Access

A new validated staging system for AL amyloidosis with Stage IIIC defining ultra-poor risk: AL International Staging System (AL-ISS)

View Full Paper
PMPaolo MilaniBYBinoy YohannanFTFoteini Theodorakakou

Key Points

  • Survival analysis revealed significant differences among stages of AL amyloidosis, with stage IIIC showcasing notably poor outcomes.
  • In validation cohorts, median overall survival was not reached for lower stages, contrasting with just 7 months for stage IIIC in treated patients.
  • The multivariable model identified longitudinal strain and cardiac biomarkers as critical prognostic factors in stratifying patients.
  • External validation confirmed robust predictive performance, underscoring the importance of this new staging system for AL amyloidosis.

Abstract

Background Outcomes in systemic AL amyloidosis have improved with modern therapy limiting utility of existing risk stratification models. We validate a new staging system, incorporating longitudinal strain (LS) to the biomarker-based (NT-proBNP and Troponin-T) staging system in the contemporary treatment era (2015-2024). Methods AL International Staging System (AL-ISS) was derived from a cohort of patients with AL amyloidosis from the UK National Amyloidosis Centre (2015-2019). The model was validated in patient cohorts from Europe (Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Switzerland), USA (2015-2024) and UK (2020-2024). Results 2493 patients were included (derivation, n=573; validation n=1920). In a multivariable model for the derivation cohort, LS≥-9% and cardiac biomarkers at previously validated thresholds (NT-proBNP 332 ng/L and 8500 ng/L and hs-TnT>50 ng/L) were independent poor prognostic factors stratifying patients into stages I, II, IIIA, IIIB and IIIC. In the validation cohort, the patient stages were stage I: 317 (17%), II: 782 (41%), IIIA: 551 (29%), IIIB: 174 (9%) and IIIC: 96 (5%), respectively (first-line daratumumab treated: 826; 43%). With a median follow-up of 34 months, median overall survival (OS) was not reached (NR); estimated 1-year, 2-year and 3-year OS was 82%, 74% and 70% respectively. Median survival for stages I-II, IIIA, IIIB and IIIC were NR, 67, 26 and 7 months (1-year OS IIIC 53% v 68% for IIIB in the daratumumab-treated patients), respectively (p<0.001). External validation exhibited good predictive performance: 12-month calibration slope was 1.09, Harrell's C 0.69, Royston’s D 1.19, R 2 D 0.25. Stage IIIC independently discriminated the poorest outcome across all cohorts. Conclusion This defines and validates a new staging system from systemic AL amyloidosis with robust identification of an ultra-poor risk stage (IIIC) in contemporarily treated patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Milani et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/694020ee2d562116f28faf9ehttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco-25-02558
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper