PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 7, 2025Journal of Clinical Oncology18 citationsOpen Access

Pirtobrutinib Versus Ibrutinib in Treatment-Naïve and Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma

View Full Paper
JWJennifer A. WoyachLQLugui QiuSGSebastian Grosicki

Key Points

  • Pirtobrutinib demonstrated noninferiority of overall response rate versus ibrutinib in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients.
  • The intention to treat analysis revealed an 87.0% overall response rate for pirtobrutinib compared to 78.5% for ibrutinib.
  • Observational analysis involved 662 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, randomized to receive either treatment.
  • This may enable improved treatment strategies for chronic lymphocytic leukemia with a better safety profile.

Abstract

PURPOSE Pirtobrutinib, a highly selective, noncovalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), has shown efficacy and safety in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) who received prior covalent BTKi. We report results, to our knowledge, from the first randomized head-to-head comparison of pirtobrutinib versus ibrutinib in BTKi-naïve CLL/SLL in both treatment-naïve (TN) patients and patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients (N = 662) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pirtobrutinib or ibrutinib. All patients were BTKi-naïve. Primary end points were overall response rate (ORR) by independent review committee (IRC) among all randomly assigned patients (intention to treat ITT) and in patients with R / R disease. RESULTS The study met its primary end points, demonstrating statistically significant noninferiority (NI) of IRC-ORR for pirtobrutinib versus ibrutinib in both the ITT (87.0% 95% CI, 82.9 to 90.4 v 78.5% 95% CI, 73.7 to 82.9; ORR ratio = 1.11 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.19; two-sided P < .0001) and R/R populations (n = 437; 84.0% 95% CI, 78.5 to 88.6 v 74.8% 95% CI, 68.5 to 80.4; ORR ratio = 1.12 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.24; two-sided P < .0001). In TN patients (n = 225), IRC-ORR was 92.9% (95% CI, 86.4 to 96.9) with pirtobrutinib versus 85.8% (95% CI, 78.0 to 91.7) with ibrutinib. Investigator assessed ORR results were consistent. Investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) favored pirtobrutinib in the ITT (hazard ratio HR, 0.57 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.83), R/R (HR, 0.73 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.13), and TN (HR, 0.24 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.59) populations. Cardiac adverse event rates of atrial fibrillation/flutter and hypertension were lower with pirtobrutinib. CONCLUSION Pirtobrutinib demonstrated NI of ORR versus ibrutinib, with a favorable early PFS trend, particularly in TN patients, and a favorable safety profile including low rates of atrial fibrillation and hypertension.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Woyach et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/694020ee2d562116f28fafe1https://doi.org/10.1200/jco-25-02477
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Pirtobrutinib after a Covalent BTK Inhibitor in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia2023 · 230 citations
  2. 2Multiple Testing in Group Sequential Trials Using Graphical Approaches2013 · 123 citations
  3. 3Resistance Mechanisms for the Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Ibrutinib2014 · 1,271 citations
  4. 4Resistance to Acalabrutinib in CLL Is Mediated Primarily By BTK Mutations2019 · 108 citations
  5. 5Acalabrutinib with or without obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil and obinutuzumab for treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (ELEVATE-TN): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial2020 · 631 citations