PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 6, 2025Multiple Sclerosis Journal2 citationsOpen Access

Dissecting definitions of disability accrual in relapsing multiple sclerosis—Have we reached standardization yet?

View Full Paper
GBGabriel BstehSMStefanie MartiHHHelly Hammer

Key Points

  • Disability accrual varies significantly based on definitions, affecting clinical understanding and treatment.
  • PIRA considerably drives disability accrual in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients over 24 months.
  • Assessment using Austrian MS Treatment Registry data analyzed 1440 definitional variants across 3525 follow-up periods.
  • Transparent reporting may enhance comparability and clinical relevance in MS research and patient care.

Abstract

Background: Distinguishing relapse-associated worsening (RAW) and progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) has reshaped understanding of disability accumulation in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). The influence of differing definitions of disability accrual on event rates and RAW/PIRA proportions remains uncertain. Methods: This observational cohort study used Austrian MS Treatment Registry data (2010–2024). A custom algorithm evaluated 1440 definitional variants of disability accrual with varying confirmation duration, baseline modeling, and RAW/PIRA classification, including recently proposed “standardized” criteria. Results: We included 3273 RMS patients (mean age 37.5 years; 67.8% female) with ⩾24 months follow-up, ⩾3 Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores, and ⩾1 EDSS score per year, contributing 3525 follow-up periods. Depending on definition, disability accrual varied between 15.7% and 41.6% of follow-ups. PIRA accounted for 56.1%–86.3% of events across definitions, while up to 8.4% were ambiguously classified, mainly due to post-relapse re-baselining or relapses during the confirmation period. Even under “standardized” criteria, 144 definitional combinations remained, with event rates ranging from 19.1% to 21.7% and PIRA contribution varying widely from 59.8% to 85.8%. Conclusion: PIRA predominantly drives disability accrual, yet definitional variation substantially influenced event rates and RAW/PIRA proportions. Transparent reporting and further optimization of definitions are critical for improving comparability, interpretation, and clinical relevance in MS research and care.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bsteh et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/694020fd2d562116f28fb510https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585251396283
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper