PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 6, 2025Angewandte Chemie International Edition4 citationsOpen Access

On the Origin of Substrate Specificity of Enzymes from the Amidohydrolase Superfamily

View Full Paper
TFTorben Fürtges

Key Points

  • Enzymes within the amidohydrolase superfamily demonstrate distinct substrate specificity mechanisms.
  • Nucleophilic conjugate addition pathways involve glutamines at variable active site positions, influencing activity.
  • Site-directed mutagenesis allows for adaptation to secondary substrates with minimal amino acid changes.
  • Understanding these mechanisms could enhance enzyme evolvability and application in biocatalysis.

Abstract

Abstract The sequencing of numerous genomes has led to the identification of open reading frames for millions of enzymes, many of which use unknown substrates. Hence, the identification of both primary and promiscuous activities remains a major challenge for enzyme research. Here, we identified the mechanistic basis of substrate specificity for members of the amidohydrolase superfamily (AHS). Comprehensive analyses of two AHS classes revealed that catalysis proceeds either via 1,4 or 1,6 nucleophilic conjugate addition mediated by a glutamine that is located at two different positions within the active site thereby shaping substrate scope in these enzymes. These different enzymatic properties result in an inverted enantioselectivity for fleeting chiral intermediates, which are transient chiral species on the reaction pathway from an achiral substrate to an achiral product. Moreover, we demonstrated that catalysis focuses on conserved core structures rather than on all moieties of a given substrate, which increases the degree of promiscuity and evolvability in these enzymes. Using site‐directed mutagenesis, we showed that an enzyme specialized in a specific nucleophilic conjugate addition can both readily adapt to secondary substrates and accommodate novel substrates by few amino acid exchanges. Hence, our study reveals mechanistic principles that underly substrate specificity, promiscuity, and enantioselectivity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Torben Fürtges (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/694020fd2d562116f28fb6a6https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202517873
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Mechanism for the Hydrolysis of Organophosphates by the Bacterial Phosphotriesterase2004 · 317 citations
  2. 2Computational Study of the Deamination Reaction of Cytosine with H2O and OH-2006 · 62 citations
  3. 3Tautomers of cytosine and their excited electronic states: a matrix isolation spectroscopic and quantum chemical study2011 · 93 citations
  4. 4Origin of the Bürgi‐Dunitz Angle2023 · 24 citations
  5. 5Structural Determinants for Substrate Selectivity in Guanine Deaminase Enzymes of the Amidohydrolase Superfamily2019 · 30 citations