Numerical analysis reveals significant impacts of anti-vortex devices on pump efficiency and performance metrics in submerged vortices.
The aim of this study is to compare submerged vortical structures for a pump mounted in a pump intake without any anti-vortex devices (AVDs), with a trident-like AVD or with a cone AVD. Another aim is to compare the pump characteristics (head, efficiency, power input and radial forces) of these pump arrangements via CFD simulation along with experimental measurements in a closed circuit. The numerical simulation of unsteady multiphase flow is established by means of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and the volume of fluid (VOF) method. To predict vortical structures in the vicinity of the pump suction bell, the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations (URANS) are solved together with the scale-adaptive simulation (SAS) turbulence model. For each AVD configuration, integral characteristics like the head, power input, efficiency and forces acting on the pump rotor are also evaluated. The numerical results show that the configuration with the cone AVD exhibits the best performance (from the point of view of both hydraulic efficiency and vorticity strength), but it requires a larger distance between the intake bottom wall and the pump bellmouth. The submerged vortices are quite stable when using an AVD, but rather unsteady without any anti-vortex tool.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sedlář et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: