PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 6, 2025Diagnostics3 citationsOpen Access

Diagnostic Value of Muscle Biopsy for the Evaluation of Adult Myopathy in Daily Clinical Practice

View Full Paper
VKVera E. A. KleinveldJWJulia WanschitzAHAnna Hotter

Key Points

  • Muscle biopsy provided a new diagnosis for 21.0% of myopathy patients, highlighting its diagnostic role.
  • In patients with mitochondrial myopathy, biopsy yielded diagnostic results 54.5% of the time based on subgroup analysis.
  • Observational analysis evaluated muscle biopsies and their relation to clinical diagnosis from 2009 to 2023.
  • These findings suggest muscle biopsy is vital when serological and genetic tests are inconclusive, especially for myopathy.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Muscle biopsy is traditionally considered a cornerstone in the diagnosis of myopathies. Advances in the clinical and laboratory evaluation of myopathies warrant re-evaluation of the diagnostic yield. Methods: Results of muscle biopsies performed between 1 January 2009 and 31 January 2023 in patients with symptoms indicative of myopathy were evaluated and set in relation to clinical diagnosis, based on phenotype, electromyography, laboratory results, and available antibody testing. Biopsies were classified as diagnostic (changed or specified clinical diagnosis), confirmative (same as clinical diagnosis), or non-informative (normal/unspecific findings). Genetic testing followed muscle biopsy at later follow-up, upon availability of genetic testing. Results: One-hundred sixty-two patients were included and divided into five groups based on clinical phenotype: inflammatory myopathy, n = 54; mitochondrial myopathy, n = 33; muscular dystrophy, n = 23; metabolic myopathy, n = 3; and non-specific phenotype (isolated hyperCKemia/myalgia), n = 49. Muscle biopsy was diagnostic in 21.0%, confirmative in 38.3% and non-informative in 40.7% of patients. The percentage of diagnostic biopsies was 66.7% in metabolic myopathy, 54.5% in mitochondrial myopathy, 17.4% in muscular dystrophy, 14.8% in inflammatory myopathy, and 4.1% in the non-specific phenotype. Conclusions: Overall, in our cohort, muscle biopsy yielded a new diagnosis or additional information in 21.0% of patients. In the majority, a diagnosis was established based on clinical and laboratory evaluation, and muscle biopsy was either confirmative or non-informative. We propose muscle biopsy in cases where serological and genetic tests are inconclusive, in the presence of specific signs indicative of myopathy, or when in-tissue genetic testing is necessary to obtain a comprehensive diagnosis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kleinveld et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6940223b2d562116f28fb79dhttps://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15243102
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Impact of muscle biopsy on the clinical decision-making process in patients with suspected idiopathic inflammatory myopathy2024 · 8 citations
  2. 2Open muscle biopsy in suspected myopathy: diagnostic yield and clinical utility2009 · 46 citations
  3. 3The genetics and pathology of mitochondrial disease2016 · 459 citations
  4. 4Diagnostic Challenges of Neuromuscular Disorders after Whole Exome Sequencing2023 · 12 citations
  5. 5Making sense of the clinical spectrum of limb girdle muscular dystrophies2018 · 24 citations