Longitudinal design observed growth variability in earthworms exposed to fungicide, indicating risks to ecological resilience and population dynamics.
Environmental risk assessments (ERAs) of chemicals typically rely on standardized ecotoxicological tests that overlook inter-individual variability, despite its importance in ecological resilience and evolutionary success. Contaminants can disrupt individual differences by altering life-history traits, amplifying fitness disparities, favoring certain phenotypes, and reducing genetic diversity, ultimately impacting population dynamics and adaptability. However, the extent to which pollutants influence inter-individual variability and its population-level consequences remains poorly understood. To address this, our study examines the inter-individual variability of growth trajectories in the earthworm Aporrectodea caliginosa in response to sublethal exposure to the two active substances of Swing® Gold fungicide. Using a longitudinal design with 30 exposed and 30 unexposed individuals, we compared mean and inter-individual growth rate variability. While the fungicide had a weak effect on the cohort’s mean growth rate, we observed a three-fold increase in inter-individual variability in the exposed group. This increase highlighted a subset of highly sensitive individuals, whose growth was reduced by up to 10% compared to the average response. Our results suggest that focusing solely on population mean effects could overlook impacts on sensitive individuals, who could serve as early indicators of environmental stress. Incorporating individual variability into ecotoxicological studies is challenging due to the labor-intensive nature of individual monitoring and the need for larger datasets. Nonetheless, these efforts are essential for refining higher-tier ERA frameworks, improving safety factors for intraspecies variability, and defining regulatory thresholds. A better understanding of how contaminants affect inter-individual variation will enhance the accuracy and ecological relevance of risk assessments, ultimately capturing the long-term implications for population and ecosystem dynamics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gollot et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: