This preprint introduces a resonance-field framework in which gravity, mass, nucleonic structure, and the Yang–Mills mass gap arise from the same underlying mechanism: the ζ-curvature of particle modes and the resulting field-depth density Φ(x) generated by bound neutrino-mode nodes. The model provides a unified operator foundation through a 4D Zeta-Resonance Operator and derives Newtonian gravity as the macroscopic limit of Φ-gradients. Unlike conventional unification attempts, the framework is generative: it offers concrete, falsifiable predictions — including isotopic gravity variation, EM-sensitive Φ-gradients, and neutrino-density effects — making it one of the few proposals that simultaneously engage mathematical physics, theoretical modeling, and laboratory-scale experimentation. The Appendix outlines the mathematical structure of the Zeta-Resonance Operator, its spectral hierarchy, and the stability conditions underpinning ζ-curvature, Φ-density, and SC-envelope formation.The framework presented here seems to constitute a full physical pathway toward a resolution of the Yang–Mills mass-gap problem: Φ₀ > 0 emerges naturally, ζ-curvature defines mass, and the operator spectrum provides the required hierarchy. The remaining step — a rigorous mathematical completion of the proof — is left as an open invitation to specialists in spectral theory and mathematical physics. This work forms part of a broader research program exploring resonance structures across physics, including particle stability, nuclear structure, gravitational theory, atmospheric dynamics, and chemical/biological field organization. The preprint may be of interest to researchers in mathematical physics, quantum field theory, gravitation, nuclear/particle theory, and precision measurement (arXiv: math-ph, hep-th, gr-qc, nucl-th). I welcome feedback and would appreciate endorsement for submission of a manuscript based on this work to the relevant arXiv categories.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nilsson Henrik (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: