PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 5, 2025Frontiers in Psychology4 citationsOpen Access

Factors influencing learners learning interest when using AI chatbots-assisted math leaning in higher education

View Full Paper
KLKang Li

Key Points

  • Learning interest enhances with increased self-efficacy and effort expectancy in mathematics education, indicating significant predictors.
  • The analysis involved 247 Chinese undergraduates using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling to establish relationships.
  • Findings suggest that AI chatbots can mitigate the effects of mathematics anxiety, promoting better learner engagement.
  • The research emphasizes the need for user-centered design in AI applications within higher education contexts.

Abstract

Introduction This study investigates the determinants of undergraduate learners’ interest in AI-supported mathematics education. Drawing upon the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and Social Cognitive Theory, a structural model was proposed and empirically tested, incorporating mathematics anxiety, self-efficacy, performance expectancy, and effort expectancy. Methods Data were collected from 247 Chinese undergraduates and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Results The findings indicate that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and self-efficacy are significant predictors of learning interest, with effort expectancy exerting the strongest influence. Self-efficacy also indirectly affects learning interest through its influence on perceptions of the system’s usefulness and ease of use. Contrary to prior research, mathematics anxiety did not significantly predict either self-efficacy or learning interest, suggesting that AI-facilitated environments may buffer negative emotional effects. Academic major moderated the relationship between mathematics anxiety and learning interest, reflecting disciplinary differences in motivational dynamics. Discussion This research contributes to theory by integrating motivational constructs into technology acceptance models and extending AI applications to cognitively demanding domains. Practical implications include prioritizing user-centered design and targeted self-efficacy interventions to enhance learner engagement.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kang Li (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6940224e2d562116f28fc1echttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1716913
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Impact of Advancements in Artificial Intelligence on Autonomous Vehicles and Modern Transportation Systems2025 · 3 citations
  2. 2Mobile formative assessment tool based on data mining techniques for supporting web-based learning2008 · 108 citations
  3. 3Educational Design Principles of Using AI Chatbot That Supports Self-Regulated Learning in Education: Goal Setting, Feedback, and Personalization2023 · 341 citations
  4. 4Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.1990 · 7,855 citations
  5. 5Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models2013 · 3,777 citations