PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 4, 2025Journal of Clinical Medicine9 citationsOpen Access

Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Difficult Airways: A Review

View Full Paper
JBJohann BauerVSVitaliy Sazonov

Key Points

  • AI models improved diagnostic accuracy for difficult airways, asserting the potential in clinical settings.
  • The MixMatch deep learning model achieved an area under the curve of 0.9435, showing superior performance against traditional methods.
  • A comprehensive literature review on AI in difficult airway prediction highlights significant advances in sensitivity and specificity.
  • Challenges remain with data privacy and algorithmic bias, pointing to the need for careful ethical considerations in clinical implementation.

Abstract

Background: Accurately predicting difficult airways is essential to ensuring patient safety in anesthesiology and emergency medicine. However, traditional assessment tools often lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity, particularly in high-pressure or resource-limited settings. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have emerged as promising tools for enhancing airway assessment. Objective: This review evaluates the performance of AI- and ML-based models for predicting difficult airways and compares them with traditional clinical methods. The review also analyzes the models’ methodological robustness, clinical applicability, and ethical considerations. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus to identify studies published between 2020 and 2025 that employed AI/ML models to predict difficult airways. Both original research and review articles were included. Key metrics, such as the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity, were extracted and compared. A qualitative analysis was performed to focus on dataset characteristics, validation strategies, model interpretability, and clinical relevance. Results: AI models demonstrated superior performance compared to traditional assessment tools. The MixMatch semi-supervised deep learning (DL) model achieved the highest performance (area under the curve AUC of 0.9435, sensitivity of 89.58%, and specificity of 90.13%). Models that used facial imaging combined with deep learning consistently outperformed those that relied solely on clinical parameters. However, methodological heterogeneity, a lack of standardized evaluation metrics, and limited population diversity impeded cross-study comparability. Few studies incorporated interpretability frameworks or addressed ethical challenges related to data privacy and algorithmic bias. Conclusions: AI and ML models have the potential to transform the assessment of difficult airways by improving diagnostic accuracy and enabling real-time clinical decision support.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bauer et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/694023fa2d562116f28fdc3bhttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238600
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper