Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In vitro analysis reveals Holu‐7 improves cytotoxicity in cancer cells, suggesting enhanced selectivity of quinazolinone derivatives.
Quinazolin‐4‐one scaffolds offer rich anticancer chemistry but often trade potency for selectivity. Building on a tubulin‐targeting lead ( MJ‐65 ), 12 new derivatives ( 26 – 37 ) were synthesized to dissect geometry–activity relationships and enhance the polarity of C2‐substituents. Cytotoxicity was profiled against cancerous (HCT116 and CAL27) and normal (FHC) cells. In silico studies employed CDOCKER against tubulin (PDB 5NJH), GROMACS for molecular dynamics (MD), and ProTox‐3.0 for toxicity estimation. The previously synthesized geometry‐matched pairs 21 – 25 were active at 10 μM. In contrast, their isomers 26 – 30 were largely inactive, revealing a configuration‐dependent binding mechanism. Optimizing polarity yielded Holu‐7 (compound 35 ; 2,4‐dihydroxyphenyl at the C2‐position), which exhibited sub‐50 nM IC 50 in HCT116/CAL27 cells and > 10 μM in FHC cells and induced robust G 2 /M arrest. Docking/MD supported stable vinca‐site engagement, with hydrogen bonds to ASP179/ASN206 and π‐stacking with TYR224. ProTox‐3.0 predicted a higher LD 50 and absence of major organ toxicities relative to MJ‐65 . This data indicates that configuration‐aware, polarity‐tuned design can deliver selective quinazolinone anticancer candidates; therefore, Holu‐7 merits further preclinical evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lai et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: