There is a significant need in psychiatry to deepen the understanding of aggressive emotional states due to their diagnostic, therapeutic, and ethical–legal implications. Traditional psychiatric approaches often inadequately differentiate between emotions such as anger, rage, resentment, envy, and contempt, overlooking their nuanced phenomenological distinctions. This conceptual review aims to examine aggressive emotions through phenomenological lenses, specifically addressing their intentionality, embodiment, and normative relational dimensions. The paper reviews key phenomenological characteristics, highlighting distinct embodied and relational structures that vary significantly across psychiatric diagnoses. Our analysis supports that aggressive emotions associated with mental illnesses frequently differ from normative emotional experiences in terms of intentional coherence and bodily affectivity. Recognizing these phenomenological divergences might enhance diagnostic accuracy by identifying disorder-specific disruptions in emotional embodiment and intentionality. Moreover, integrating phenomenological insights could improve the effectiveness of psychopharmacological stabilization and individualized psychological interventions targeting underlying affective disturbances. Ultimately, greater phenomenological awareness might also support ethically informed assessments concerning patient autonomy, capacity to consent, justification for coercive treatments, and criminal responsibility. This approach thus facilitates more precise, individualized, and ethically sound psychiatric practices.
Madeira et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: