This analysis of Aquinas reveals how the glorified universe may include animals, suggesting theological implications for divine fittingness.
In this paper, I examine Aquinas’s arguments for the absence of animals in the glorified universe. In my response, I turn to Aquinas’s account of fittingness with respect to God’s nature, utilizing this account to argue that it befits God for some animals to exist in the glorified universe and to be ordered to Him as the final cause. I raise and resolve several potential Aquinian objections to this conclusion and I offer three possible, interrelated reasons as to why God might include animals. In conclusion, I present three additional theological considerations that accord with my conclusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jennifer Hart Weed (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: