Formative assessment plays a central role in supporting learners’ progress by providing continuous feedback during the learning process. This study investigates the effect of formative assessment strategies on the writing accuracy of 41 s-year EFL students at Mizan Tepi University, Ethiopia. Using pre- and post-tests, the study measured changes in four key areas of writing accuracy: grammar, punctuation, spelling, and sentence structure. The results revealed statistically significant improvements across all aspects, with mean score increases of + 11.6 in grammar (p < 0.001), + 13.3 in punctuation (p < 0.001), + 12.8 in spelling (p < 0.001), and + 12.3 in sentence structure (p < 0.001). Regression analysis further confirmed that each writing component significantly predicted overall writing accuracy (p < 0.001). Qualitative findings from interviews and classroom observations highlighted that timely, clear feedback, peer collaboration, and self-reflection boosted learner confidence and engagement. These findings demonstrate that structured formative assessment, especially when it integrates teacher feedback, peer review, and self-assessment, substantially enhances writing proficiency. The study recommends sustained professional development for instructors to ensure consistent implementation and maximize learning gains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tamirat Taye (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: