With the widespread adoption of colonoscopic screening, the detection rate of rectal neuroendocrine tumors (rNETs) has risen year by year. Treatment strategies for small (< 1 cm) and large (> 2 cm) lesions are relatively well established, but the optimal management pathway for intermediate-sized (1-2 cm) rNETs remains controversial. Inspired by the recent study by Kim et al , this editorial summarizes differences among international guidelines for managing intermediate-sized rNETs, the selection and latest advances in endoscopic techniques, and examines the feasibility and oncologic safety of endoscopic resection for intermediate-sized rNETs. We contend that future management should focus on the clinical application of molecular stratification, biomarkers, and dynamic risk modeling to enable individualized decision-making. Given global disparities in medical resources, a tiered care system based on risk stratification and resource availability should be established to ensure the safety, equity, and accessibility of rNETs treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: