Urban migrants face many consumption problems in developing countries. This study systematically examines the impact of migrants’ housing affordability on families’ non-housing consumption from the perspective of leasing, and it explores the mechanism underlying the effect of the level of access to public services on it. This study finds the following: (1) There is a significant double-threshold effect in the crowding-out effect of weakened housing affordability on the household non-housing consumption of migrants, with threshold values of 20.6% and 40.0%. (2) There is a significant non-linear relationship between the housing affordability and the household non-housing consumption of migrants with regard to the threshold of the public service level. With the increase in the threshold value of public services, the crowding-out effect of the weakening of housing affordability on non-housing consumption gradually weakens. (3) The influence of housing affordability on non-housing consumption has significant heterogeneous effects. The crowding-out effect of weakened housing affordability on non-housing consumption is more obvious for third-tier cities, shared-rental households, and migrant households that have lived in the local area for more than 5 years. This study has important theoretical and policy implications for how to promote the consumption of migrants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: