This study evaluates the technical, design, and economic feasibility of large-scale hydrogen storage in deep water-bearing geological formations (aquifers), presenting it as a scalable solution for seasonal energy storage within the European Union’s decarbonization framework. A techno-economic model was developed for a 1 BCM facility, integrating geomechanical, microbial, and thermodynamic criteria. The results indicate a recoverable hydrogen fraction of 70–85%, with dissolution and microbial conversion losses limited to below 10% under optimized operational regimes. Geochemical and microbiological modelling demonstrated that sulfate-reducing and methanogenic bacterial activity can be reduced by 80–90% through controlled salinity and pH management. The proposed design, incorporating high-permeability sandstone reservoirs (100–300 mD), hydrogen-resistant materials, and fibre-optic monitoring ensures stable containment at 60–100 bar pressure and enables multi-cycle operation with minimal leakage (<0.05% per year). Economically, the baseline Levelized Cost of Hydrogen Storage (LCOHS) for aquifers was found to be ~0.29 EUR/kWh, with potential reductions to ~0.18 EUR/kWh through optimized drilling, modularized compression systems, and microbial mitigation. The lifecycle carbon footprint (0.20–0.36 kg CO2-eq/kg H2) is competitive with other geological storage methods, while offering superior scalability and strategic flexibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jansons et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: