Since the development of running specific prosthetics (RSP) in the 1980?s, lower extremity amputees have been able to engage in more modes of physical activity including running competitively and recreationally. Researchers have been led to investigate different mechanical properties like stiffness and hysteresis using machine testing. However, machine testing is limited by loading and deformation rates that are well below those recorded during running. The purpose of this investigation is to examine the mechanical properties of RSPs in situ. Three-dimensional motion capture and force platforms were used to record deformation and external loading while two participants ran at their 1-mile pace using their prescribed prosthetic device. Linear and non-linear prosthetic stiffness and hysteresis were calculated for each trial across loading and restoration phases using the vector magnitudes of 3-dimesional force and deformation measured via markers affixed to the prosthetic. Linear stiffness during the loading phase was relatively similar across participants (~26kN/m), despite differences in prosthetic type, body mass, and running speeds. However, linear stiffness was reduced by 5-10% during the restoration phase. Overall, both prosthetic's force-deformation relationships were nonlinear, exhibiting variable stiffness throughout each phase, a crossover point (“pinched hysteresis curve”), and smooth transitions between loading restoration phases. Machine tested stiffness values from the literature were approximately 5kN/m lower compared to in situ stiffness values. These findings illustrate the importance of understanding the in-situ properties for RSPs and for each user.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bennett et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: