Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article examines how Soviet-era linguistic suppression in Uzbekistan contributed to environmental degradation across Central Asia, as exemplified by the Aral Sea disaster. It argues that this suppression constituted epistemic displacement, dismantling traditional systems of ecological knowledge and replacing adaptive, local management with extractive, centralised models. More than three decades after independence, Uzbekistan’s environmental governance remains tied to a colonial linguistic framework that restricts community participation and undermines ecological resilience. Through historical discourse analysis, comparative case studies, and critical ecolinguistic theory, the study demonstrates that reintegrating Uzbek ecological vocabulary into law, education, and policy is essential for sustainable reform. It concludes that linguistic justice is a fundamental condition for fair and effective environmental restoration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shokirova et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: