Women's experience and acceptability of elective late-term induction of labour: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies using GRADE CERQual

Q: What type of study is this?

This is a Systematic Review study.

Jeanett Friis Rohde; Anja Ussing; Mina Nicole Händel; Jeppe Bennekou Schroll; Birgitte Holm Petersen; Simon Tarp; Merete Bjerrum

doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2025.102141

November 26, 2025Women and BirthOpen Access

Women's experience and acceptability of elective late-term induction of labour: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies using GRADE CERQual

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Abstract

This meta-synthesis highlights that women undergoing induction of labour prioritise their baby's safety and often accept the procedure despite discomfort or limited autonomy. The review suggests that healthcare providers should adopt a personalised approach.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Rohde et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/694035e12d562116f2908a56 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2025.102141

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Women's experience and acceptability of elective late-term induction of labour: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies using GRADE CERQual

Ask about this paper

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Women's experience and acceptability of elective late-term induction of labour: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies using GRADE CERQual

Ask about this paper

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading