AbstractIn comparative clinical investigations for nearly all disease types, patient responses - signifying clinically meaningful improvements in health or reductions in disease burden - are routinely employed as key end points for assessing treatment activity or efficacy. Trials typically use the response rate to summarize treatment effects, a metric with limitations for investigating the temporal profile of the effect. In this Clinical Trials Workshop, the authors present a novel approach for analyzing time to response and duration of response in clinical trials using, as an example, data from the JAVELIN Renal-101 trial of avelumab and axitinib versus sunitinib for treating renal cell carcinoma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tian et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: