PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 25, 2025International Journal of Urology3 citationsOpen Access

Outcomes of Nivolumab‐Plus‐Ipilimumab in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Second Interim Analysis of the J‐ ENCORE Study

View Full Paper
TSTomokazu SazukaKTKatsunori TatsugamiSSSuguru Shirotake

Key Points

  • The objective response rate was 37.6%, indicating how effectively nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab helps fight cancer.
  • With a median follow-up of 35.4 months, the overall survival rate reached 67.2% at the 24-month mark, highlighting its importance for patients.
  • Assessment involved 274 patients receiving nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma, tracking responses and adverse events over time periods of 1 to 2 years that were minimally observed post-treatment initiation and discontinuation trends that emerged subsequently during monitoring phases for patients and treatment groups alike to reveal shared metrics across vital statistics utilized throughout the phase study monitoring system applied here for understanding overarching outcomes affecting cancer treatments thus far herein reflecting on healthy follow-ups afterwards sustaining patient health as they leave initial supportive treatment by chiefly managing overall responses thereafter correlated with negative impacts stemming from prior uses of drug treatments present in cancer therapy cases here before finally resigning toward completing optimal approaches within treatment consideration needs when extraneous side effects erupt as one practical streamlining concept of continuity involved during this trial design study history and patient experience with multilayered complexities thus prioritized neatly under observation data series like these.).

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives J‐ENCORE is a multicenter prospective observational study in Japan involving advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients receiving nivolumab‐plus‐ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) as first‐line treatment. The minimum 1‐year observation revealed the efficacy and safety of NIVO+IPI comparable to those in CheckMate 214, and evaluated patient characteristics across subgroups for response and early progression. This minimum 2‐year observation focuses on the post‐treatment status after NIVO+IPI discontinuation. Methods The objective response rate (ORR), response duration, progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs), treatment‐free status, and second‐line treatment were evaluated. Results The study included 274 patients (median age, 68 years; 24.8% aged ≥ 75 years; 15.7% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥ 2; 58.0%, intermediate risk; 42.0%, poor risk) from 37 sites, with a median follow‐up of 35.4 (range, 24.4–47.0) months. The ORR was 37.6%, with a median real‐world duration of response at 17.1 months; 30.2% had real‐world PFS ≥ 24 months, and the OS rate at 24 months was 67.2%. TRAEs of any grade, grade 3/4, and grade 5 occurred in 77.4%, 42.7%, and 1.1% of patients, respectively. Furthermore, 11.1% experienced late‐onset TRAEs 28–100 days after discontinuation. For patients discontinuing NIVO+IPI due to adverse events, median treatment‐free survival was 7.4 months; 34.9% had a treatment‐free interval ≥ 12 months. Second‐line treatment ORR was 22.0%, with cabozantinib as the most common choice. Conclusions We determined the long‐term real‐world effectiveness and safety of NIVO+IPI, providing beneficial information on post‐treatment status. Trial Registration UMIN Clinical Trials Registry number: UMIN000036772; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04043975

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sazuka et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/694037b62d562116f290ab55https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.70281
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper