The exploration potential, storage capacity, and exploitability of the deep shale-gas reservoirs are governed by various characteristics of their pore networks. Conventional methods cannot fully capture these features across scales, highlighting the need for an integrated, multi-technique approach. In this study, pore structure and connectivity of the Wufeng–Longmaxi Formation (Luzhou Block) were investigated using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) with the Mosaic Acquisition and Positioning System (MAPS), ImageJ (ImageJ 2.14.0)-based pore analysis, Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry (MIP), and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR). Based on the samples from eight reservoir layers of Wufeng-WF and Longmaxi-LM111–7, shale pore connectivity was classified into three grades. Grade A layers, with connected pore volumes above 0.0067 cm3/g and porosity exceeding 1.75%, showed trimodal NMR pore-size distributions and strong connectivity among micro, meso, and macropores. Grade B layers exhibited bimodal pore distributions, moderate pore connectivity (0.0057–0.0067 cm3/g; 1.55–1.75% porosity), and sponge-like organic pores with isolated mineral pores. Grade C layers, with connected pore volumes below 0.0057 cm3/g, showed poor connectivity and unimodal NMR responses. Connected pores (1–100 nm) contributed 20–35% of total pore volume, reflecting the strong heterogeneity of the formation. Interconnected inorganic mineral-hosted pores were found to link locally connected organic pores, forming continuous pore networks. The qualitative and quantitative identification of the pore connectivity of shale reservoirs with MAPS, MIP, and NMR approach provides a robust framework for evaluating shale pore connectivity and identifying high-quality reservoir targets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: