Analysis reveals how performance-viewing media like live and livestreaming affect audience experience, highlighting critical factors.
Alternative viewing methods like live-streaming and pre-recording have expanded access to performing arts, yet a systematic analysis framework to compare among different performance-viewing media is lacking. Integrating Lengel and Daft’s Media Richness Theory, Radbourne et al.’s audience communication dimensions, and Chan et al.’s framework on theatre experience, this paper proposes a theoretical framework of performance richness which critically examines how different performance-viewing media, including live on stage, livestreaming, or pre-recorded performances, can be compared through eight medium-richness features across three communication dimensions. The presence (or absence) of each medium-richness features is proposed to affect different aspects of audience experience including cognition, emotion, sensation, authenticity, coherence, and collective engagement. This framework establishes a connection between traditional live productions and emerging media of performing arts, provides an organized approach to examine how different performance-viewing media can affect audience experience. Representative case studies are included to illustrate the analytical power of the framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zuo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: