Retrospective analysis reveals elevated NT-proBNP levels indicate worse clinical outcomes in TAVI patients, suggesting prognostic value for management.
Background N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is a recognized marker of myocardial wall stress, but its prognostic role in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains incompletely defined. This study assessed whether NT-proBNP levels at admission and discharge—interpreted using age-specific guideline thresholds—are associated with long-term clinical outcomes post-TAVI. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 683 consecutive patients who underwent successful TAVI at Magna Graecia University between 2009 and 2023. NT-proBNP was measured at both admission and discharge. Patients were stratified into low or high NT-proBNP groups based on age-adjusted cut-offs. Among 468 patients with paired measurements, four NT-proBNP trajectory groups were identified: Low–Low, Low–High, High–Low, and High–High. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure (HF) rehospitalization at 2 years. Multivariable Cox models were used to adjust for confounders. Results At admission, 41.6% of patients had elevated NT-proBNP, associated with worse echocardiographic parameters and more comorbidities. Elevated baseline NT-proBNP predicted a higher risk of the primary outcome (26.1% vs. 13.7%; HR 2.23; 95% CI, 1.51–3.28) and all-cause mortality (21.3% vs. 9.6%; HR 2.40; 95% CI, 1.52–3.79). Among patients with serial values, 34.6% had persistently elevated NT-proBNP, while only 10.7% improved. High–High and Low–High groups showed worse outcomes compared to Low–Low; High–Low patients had comparable risk to Low–Low. Conclusions NT-proBNP, interpreted with age-specific thresholds, is a strong independent predictor of adverse outcomes after TAVI. Serial assessment adds prognostic value and may help guide postprocedural management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salerno et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: