A deep learning model improves functional annotation of genes in microbial ecology, suggesting roles for methane, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycles.
Remote functional annotation continues to impede progress in microbial ecology, as alignment-based approaches still leave over one-third of microbial sequences functionally unresolved. In contrast, pre-trained natural-language–processing approaches have shown strong potential for inferring functions from diverse biological sequences, and here we introduce a protein language modeling approach allowing us to classify sequences into 37 defined key pathway categories involved in 4 major biogeochemical cycles (methane, sulfur, nitrogen and phosphorus cycles). To do so, we fine-tuned ESM2-8m using databases curated for biogeochemical cycling pathways. Our resultant BioGeochemical cycling transFormer (BioGeoFormer or BGF) was high-performing on validation and test sets, producing embeddings that exhibit an ability to infer protein function at a metabolic pathway level. BGF was applied to a dataset of metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) constructed from methane-fueled, deep-sea, “cold seep” environments to demonstrate its utility in contrast to current informatics approaches. We employed multiple gene assignments to identify gene function within these MAGs. A total of 1.05M genes were assigned biogeochemical functions, with BGF alone suggesting putative ecosystem roles for 0.49M (46%) of these at a confidence of 85% or greater; these genes were classified as unknown by the other approaches. Across the pathways of interest, BGF identified 6 times as many genes, on average, as Hidden Markov models (HMMs) as well as alignment based approaches across the various pathways. BGF provides a novel tool that is capable of informing process-based hypotheses in diverse systems, highlighting cryptic proteins most notably linked to methane, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycling while uncovering the mysteries within microbial dark matter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wynne et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: