Normative legal analysis reveals gaps in Indonesian law regarding temporary incapacity of the president, suggesting governance improvements.
In a presidential system, the president plays a key role as both head of state and head of government, making the position crucial in governance. Therefore, a vacancy in the presidency whether temporary or permanent should not occur, even briefly. However, Indonesian law only regulates permanent incapacity and does not address temporary incapacity, creating a legal vacuum. This study aims to formulate a legal concept to regulate the temporary incapacity of the president. The Author considers this topic is essential to be implemented within a Presidential system of government, given that the President cannot be dismissed because of policy disagreements. The research uses normative legal analysis with conceptual, historical, and comparative approaches, analyzed through the theory of mandate authority. The findings show that the lack of legal provisions for temporary presidential incapacity can disrupt government functions and undermine the rule of law. This gap exists in both normal situations (leave, minor illness, travel) and abnormal conditions (emergencies, serious health issues), where delegation of duties is left to administrative practices. Therefore, a Presidential Institution Law is needed to clearly define the delegation of presidential duties. This law should distinguish between administrative delegation in normal situations and limited delegation of substantive authority in abnormal situations through a mandate mechanism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maulana et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: