PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 20, 2025Arthritis & Rheumatology2 citationsOpen Access

Risk factors for relapse in ANCA ‐associated vasculitis among patients with relapse after induction of remission with rituximab

View Full Paper
EREllen RomichJBJoshua F. BakerTRThomas R. Riley

Key Points

  • To identify risk factors linked to relapse in ANCA-associated vasculitis after rituximab re-induction.
  • Post-hoc analysis of the RITAZAREM clinical trial.
  • Included patients aged 15 and older with AAV and positive ANCA tests.
  • Patients were randomized to either continue rituximab or switch to azathioprine for maintenance therapy.
  • 99 relapses observed during follow-up.
  • Musculoskeletal involvement and higher patient global assessment linked with relapse during maintenance.
  • Presence of CD19+ B-cells and reappearance of ANCA indicated higher relapse risk during off-treatment.

Abstract

Objective To determine risk factors for relapse of ANCA‐associated vasculitis (AAV) after re‐induction of remission with rituximab and discontinuation of maintenance therapy. Methods This is a post‐hoc analysis of the RITAZAREM clinical trial. Patients 15 years or older with AAV and a positive test for anti‐proteinase‐3 (PR3‐) or anti‐myeloperoxidase (MPO)‐ANCA who achieved remission after re‐induction with rituximab and glucocorticoids were randomized at month 4 to receive continued rituximab or azathioprine for a maintenance period up to 24 months, followed by observation until relapse or up to 48 months. Generalized estimating equations logistic regression identified baseline and time‐varying risk factors for relapse by the next visit for the two study phases: maintenance (months 4‐24) and off‐treatment (months 24‐48). Results Among 170 patients (median (IQR) age 59 (48‐68) years, disease duration 5 (2‐10) years), 99 relapses occurred (46 during maintenance). During maintenance, musculoskeletal involvement (odds ratio (OR) 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.8 1.1, 7.2, p=0.03) and higher patient global assessment (OR 95% CI: 1.1 1.0, 1.2, p=0.04) were associated with relapse. During the off‐treatment phase, presence of CD19+ B‐cells (OR 95% CI: 2.5 1.2, 5.1, p=0.01) and reappearance of ANCA (OR 95% CI: 3.2 1.3, 7.7, p=0.01) were each associated with higher relapse risk. Multivariable analysis identified markers of inflammation (changes in platelets, white blood cells, and immunoglobulin A) associated with relapse. Conclusions Risk factors for relapse in AAV vary by treatment phase. Monitoring markers of inflammation and immune reconstitution may identify patients at risk for relapse, particularly after treatment withdrawal.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Romich et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6945e93b5151ab1219e4d7e4https://doi.org/10.1002/art.70025
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper