Mixed-methods study demonstrates improved clinical decision-making and knowledge retention in ICU nurses through a novel training model based on cognitive load theory.
Abstract Background: In intensive care unit (ICU), traditional training models fail to meet the integrated cognitive demands. Additionally, subspecialty training and mind mapping have rarely been applied with a unifying theoretical framework for knowledge retention. Aims : Based on the Cognitive Load Theory and experiential learning cycle, this study aimed to construct and validate a closed-loop training model (Subspecialty-Mind Mapping-Rolling Quiz) to enhance ICU nurses' clinical decision-making, knowledge retention, self-efficacy and critical thinking. Design : An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. Methods : The quantitative phase consisted of a cluster randomized controlled trial involving 196 nurses from 4 ICU units randomly assigned to either an intervention group (2 units, n=102) receiving the closed-loop training or a control group (2 units, n=94) receiving traditional training from January to June 2025. Participants' Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR), theoretical and practical examination, General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory-Chinese Version (CTDI-CV) scores, and knowledge retention rates were compared at 6-month follow-up. In the qualitative phase, 16 participants were sampled for semi-structured interviews. Results : Quantitative results showed that the intervention group had significantly higher LCJR scores (t=12.917, p<0.01), post-intervention and delayed post-test theoretical and practical, GSES, and CTDI-CV scores (all p<0.05). Qualitative analysis identified four themes: reconstruction of cognitive schema, shift in learning identity, sustained activation of metacognition and incentives coexisting with challenges in implementation. Conclusion : The Subspecialty-Mind Mapping-Rolling Quiz enhanced ICU nurses' clinical decision-making, knowledge retention, self-efficacy, and critical thinking ability. By fostering knowledge internalization and contextualized retrieval, this model serves as an effective training solution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhuang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: