Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Meta-analysis reveals lower cardiovascular risk with tocilizumab and higher risk with synthetic DMARDs versus TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis, suggesting differing vascular safety.
Objective We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate the comparative effects of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors ( TNF i), non‐ TNF i biologics, and conventional synthetic disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (cs DMARD s) on cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis ( RA ). Methods Using a systematic search through May 8, 2018, we included 14 observational studies in adults with RA treated with TNF i, non‐ TNF i biologics, tofacitinib, or cs DMARD s, reporting the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events ( MACE ) or stroke. Only studies reporting active comparators were included. We performed random effects meta‐analysis and estimated odds ratios ( OR s) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI s). Results As compared to TNF i, tocilizumab was associated with a decreased risk of MACE ( OR 0.59 [95% CI 0.34–1.00]), whereas cs DMARD s were associated with an increased risk of MACE (cs DMARD s including methotrexate OR 1.45 [95% CI 1.09–1.93]; without methotrexate OR 2.57 [95% CI 1.32–5.00]), without heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%); there was no difference in risk of MACE between abatacept and TNF i ( OR 0.89 [95% CI 0.71–1.11]), or between tocilizumab and abatacept ( OR 0.81 [0.57–1.16]). Based on 11 cohorts (n = 135,053 patients), as compared to TNF i, cs DMARD s were associated with an increased risk of stroke ( OR 1.17 [95% CI 1.01–1.36]); there was no difference in risk of stroke between different biologics (tocilizumab versus TNF i OR 0.98 [95% CI 0.59–1.61]; abatacept versus TNF i OR 1.08 [0.86–1.34]; tocilizumab versus abatacept OR 0.73 [95% CI 0.39–1.38]), without heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%). No comparative studies on cardiovascular risk with tofacitinib were identified. Conclusion Based on meta‐analysis, as compared to TNF i, tocilizumab may be associated with a reduced risk of MACE , whereas cs DMARD s may be associated with an increased risk of MACE and stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: