Abstract Aims: This study was conducted to evaluate the quality, content, and reliability of intraosseous intervention videos on YouTube and the accuracy of their use in training. Methods: In this study, the keyword "Intraosseous Vascular Access" was searched on YouTube on 2/20/2023, and the first 73 videos in English were included. Two independent European Research Council trainers assessed the video characteristics, video category, whether it was useful or misleading, video quality, and whether the intraosseous route steps were correctly applied. Analyses were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 26 package. Results: Of the 73 videos included in the study, 71.2% were deemed useful by the first expert, and 90.9% of the useful videos were uploaded by a nonprofit organization. The mean and standard deviation of the Global Quality Scale score was 3.33±1.61, and 32.9% of the videos were of excellent quality. 68.5% were deemed worthwhile by the second expert, and 83.3% of the useful videos were uploaded as individual videos. The mean and standard deviation of the Global Quality Scale score was 3.15±1.61, and 28.8% of the videos were of poor quality. Conclusions: When the intraosseous intervention steps were examined, the most correct method was found to be "Positioning the patient appropriately for the procedure". In this study, a qualitative analysis of intraosseous educational videos on YouTube revealed that the videos were generally useful, especially those uploaded by nonprofit organizations and individuals.
Kıyıcı et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: