Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review highlights growth strategies and surface treatments for enhancing charge transport in perovskite solar cells, suggesting engineering solutions.
Perovskite solar cells are leading candidates for next-generation photovoltaics owing to their high power conversion efficiency and excellent optoelectronic properties. Yet polycrystalline devices have plateaued below the Shockley–Queisser (SQ) limit, mainly because grain-boundary–induced nonradiative recombination and ion migration impede long-range charge transport and device stability. By contrast, Single-crystal thin films (SCTFs)―with intrinsically low defect densities and negligible grain boundaries―nominally offer a practical route toward the theoretical efficiency limit; however, current SCTF devices still fall short of the SQ limit, underscoring persistent surface and interface losses. Among fabrication routes, solution-processed space-confined growth, often leveraging inverse-temperature crystallization, has emerged as an effective strategy for producing high-quality SCTFs. This review synthesizes how growth parameters―solution chemistry, supersaturation, temperature gradients, gap thickness, and substrate wettability―govern thickness uniformity, crystallographic orientation, surface termination, and trap density. We highlight that residual-solution–induced secondary crystallization and high surface trap densities are primary sources of interfacial losses. Finally, we argue that closing the gap to the SQ limit requires coordinated solvent/interface engineering together with targeted surface treatments, underpinned by the establishment of a precise surface analysis framework and clear criteria for defining “true” SCTFs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: