The article demonstrates how peer learning improves participation in EMI contexts, highlighting its role in inclusive education.
English-Medium Instruction (EMI) lecture courses and programs have become common inhigher education across non-English-speaking countries. EMI programs are often implemented toadvance internationalization, improve English proficiency, and to increase access to global academiccommunities. However, many EMI classes remain lecture-centered with limited opportunities forstudent interaction, language practice, or collaborative content learning. This article argues that short,structured peer learning exchanges provide a practical, scalable way to address this gap withoutcompromising content coverage. Drawing on sociocultural and interactionist perspectives, as well asexperience in a Japanese university context, the article distinguishes peer learning from longer-termcollaborative learning models and explains why peer learning is more compatible with EMI lectures thatoften have time, pacing, and proficiency constraints. By integrating frequent, low-stakes, linguisticallyscaffolded interaction points into lectures, instructors can support comprehension, reduce affectivebarriers, and promote greater participation. A peer learning approach has the potential to make EMIlectures more interactive, inclusive, and aligned with the broader goals of EMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dana Lingley (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: