PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 6, 2026Sports0 citationsOpen Access

Effects of Contrast Water Therapy on Physiological and Perceptual Recovery Following High-Intensity Interval Swimming in Collegiate Swimmers

View Full Paper
KKKazuki KinoMNMitsuo NeyaYWYuya Watanabe

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess the impact of contrast water therapy on recovery metrics in collegiate swimmers after intense training sessions.
  • Collegiate male swimmers participated in two recovery conditions: Contrast Water Therapy (CWT) and passive rest (PAS).
  • Swimmers completed 100 m maximal-effort intervals in a crossover design, experiencing both recovery methods.
  • Physiological and perceptual outcomes including blood lactate, blood pressure, and subjective fatigue were measured post-exercise.
  • CWT significantly lowered post-recovery blood lactate levels compared to PAS (7.75 vs. 10.86 mmol/L), p = 0.002.
  • Subjective fatigue was also reduced with CWT (6.60 vs. 7.60 cm), p = 0.021.
  • No significant differences were found in blood pressure or 100-m swimming performance between recovery methods.

Abstract

This study examined the effects of contrast water therapy (CWT) on physiological, perceptual, and performance-related recovery in collegiate male swimmers following high-intensity interval training. Fifteen freestyle swimmers (19.3 ± 1.1 years) completed two sessions of five 100 m maximal-effort intervals under two recovery conditions, CWT and passive rest (PAS), in a crossover design. The CWT protocol consisted of 10 alternating immersions in hot (40–41 °C, 60 s) and cold (20–21 °C, 30 s) water. Blood lactate (LA), blood pressure (BP), and subjective fatigue (VAS-FAS) were assessed at multiple time points. Compared with PAS, CWT resulted in significantly lower post-recovery blood LA (7.75 ± 2.08 vs. 10.86 ± 2.86 mmol/L, p = 0.002) and reduced subjective fatigue (6.60 ± 1.30 vs. 7.60 ± 0.91 cm, p = 0.021), whereas no significant differences were observed in BP or 100-m swimming performance. Individual-level analyses revealed heterogeneous responses, with most swimmers demonstrating improved lactate clearance and reduced fatigue following CWT, although performance responses varied among participants. These findings indicate that CWT facilitates physiological and perceptual recovery without producing immediate performance enhancement. CWT may be considered a practical short-term recovery option for competitive swimmers, although its effectiveness likely depends on individual response characteristics. Further research involving larger and more diverse samples is warranted to clarify optimal application parameters and individual recovery profiles.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kino et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/695d855e3483e917927a4d0chttps://doi.org/10.3390/sports14010026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper