PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 6, 2026Processes1 citationsOpen Access

Distributed Robust Optimization Scheduling for Integrated Energy Systems Based on Data-Driven and Green Certificate-Carbon Trading Mechanisms

View Full Paper
YCYuxiao ChenWWWeiqing WangXLXiaozhu Li

Key Points

  • The research aims to optimize scheduling in integrated energy systems through a novel data-driven framework.
  • Develops a scheduling framework integrating data-driven methods and multi-objective robust optimization.
  • Utilizes a deep temporal feature extraction model with LSTM-AE and K-Means clustering for scenario generation.
  • Implements a Power-to-Gas model considering waste heat recovery and energy cascading with market mechanisms.
  • Reduces total operating costs by 9.0% and carbon emissions by 139.9 tons compared to traditional methods.
  • Maintains operational safety under extreme source-load fluctuations.

Abstract

High renewable energy penetration in Integrated Energy Systems (IES) introduces significant challenges related to bilateral source-load uncertainty and low-carbon economic dispatch. To address these issues, this paper proposes a novel scheduling framework that synergizes data-driven scenario generation with multi-objective distributionally robust optimization (DRO). Specifically, a deep temporal feature extraction model based on Long Short-Term Memory Autoencoder (LSTM-AE) is integrated with K-Means clustering to generate four typical operation scenarios, effectively capturing complex source-load fluctuations. To further enhance system efficiency and environmental sustainability, a refined Power-to-Gas (P2G) model considering waste heat recovery is developed to realize energy cascading, coupled with a joint market mechanism that integrates Green Certificate Trading (GCT) and tiered carbon pricing. Building on this, a multi-objective DRO model based on Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) is formulated to optimize the trade-off between operating costs and carbon emissions. Case studies based on California test data demonstrate that the proposed method reduces total operating costs by 9.0% and carbon emissions by 139.9 tons compared to traditional robust optimization (RO). Moreover, the results confirm that the system maintains operational safety even under extreme source-load fluctuation scenarios.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/695d855e3483e917927a4d33https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14010174
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper