Novel framework automates artificial respiration assessment in CPR training, indicating improved evaluation accuracy.
Traditional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training faces limitations such as instructor dependency, low efficiency, and subjective assessment. To address these issues, this study proposes a novel computer vision-based method for the automation and objective evaluation of artificial respiration, shifting focus to the long-overlooked ventilation component. We developed an evaluation framework integrating human pose estimation and spatio-temporal graph convolution network (ST-GCN): first, OpenPose is utilized to extract skeletal keypoints of the rescuer, followed by action classification and recognition-including chest compressions, airway opening, and artificial breathing via a ST-GCN. Based on the American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines, this research defines and implements five quantitative metrics for ventilation quality, including CPR operation procedure, chin-frontal angle, interruption time, ventilation time, and ventilation frequency. An automated scoring model was established accordingly. Validated on a self-constructed dataset containing multi-source videos, the model achieved an accuracy of 87.64% in recognizing artificial respiration actions and 84.47% in evaluating action standardization. Experimental results demonstrate that the system can effectively and objectively evaluate the quality of artificial respiration. Compared with traditional instructor-dependent approaches, this study provides a low-cost, scalable technical solution, offering a new pathway for promoting high-quality CPR training.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: