PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 2014309 citations

Remote measurement of cognitive stress via heart rate variability

View Full Paper
DMDaniel McDuffSGSarah GontarekRPRosalind W. Picard

Key Result

Remotely measured cognitive stress showed significantly higher normalized low frequency HRV and breathing rates compared to rest, with 85% model prediction accuracy.

Structured PICO

Can a novel five band digital camera remotely detect physiological changes (HRV, breathing rate) to accurately predict cognitive stress in participants?

P
Population
10 participants
I
Intervention
Cognitive stress condition monitored remotely (at a distance of 3m) using a novel five band digital camera capturing facial videos
C
Comparator
Rest condition monitored with the same remote camera setup
O
Outcome
Changes in physiological parameters (normalized low frequency HRV components, breathing rates, heart rates) and accuracy of a person-independent classifier to predict cognitive stresssurrogate

A novel digital camera setup can remotely detect physiological changes like HRV and breathing rate to accurately classify cognitive stress without physical contact.

Abstract

Remote detection of cognitive load has many powerful applications, such as measuring stress in the workplace. Cognitive tasks have an impact on breathing and heart rate variability (HRV). We show that changes in physiological parameters during cognitive stress can be captured remotely (at a distance of 3m) using a digital camera. A study (n=10) was conducted with participants at rest and under cognitive stress. A novel five band digital camera was used to capture videos of the face of the participant. Significantly higher normalized low frequency HRV components and breathing rates were measured in the stress condition when compared to the rest condition. Heart rates were not significantly different between the two conditions. We built a person-independent classifier to predict cognitive stress based on the remotely detected physiological parameters (heart rate, breathing rate and heart rate variability). The accuracy of the model was 85% (35% greater than chance).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

McDuff et al. (2014) studied this question. Remotely measured cognitive stress showed significantly higher normalized low frequency HRV and breathing rates compared to rest, with 85% model prediction accuracy.

synapsesocial.com/papers/695f70e1d408d4fcf44f86c0https://doi.org/10.1109/embc.2014.6944243
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Measuring Task-related Changes in Heart Rate Variability2007 · 62 citations
  2. 2A comparison of photoplethysmography and ECG recording to analyse heart rate variability in healthy subjects2009 · 332 citations
  3. 3Important influence of respiration on human R-R interval power spectra is largely ignored1993 · 768 citations
  4. 4Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement2007 · 3,949 citations
  5. 5Improvements in Remote Cardiopulmonary Measurement Using a Five Band Digital Camera2014 · 288 citations