Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation reduced ICD therapies by 81% in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia, with a median follow-up of 14 months.
Does stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) reduce VT burden and is it safe in patients with structural heart disease and refractory ventricular tachycardia ineligible for catheter ablation?
Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is a promising and effective non-invasive salvage option that significantly reduces ICD therapies in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia and advanced cardiomyopathy.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
Abstract Introduction Ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with structural heart disease can be life-threatening and may persist despite antiarrhythmic therapy and catheter ablation. When standard treatments are ineffective or contraindicated, stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) has emerged as a non-invasive salvage option. Methods This prospective, single-center study included 19 patients with structural heart disease and recurrent VT unresponsive to conventional therapy and who were ineligible for ablation. Patients were selected by a multidisciplinary team and underwent cardiac CT and electroanatomic mapping for substrate characterization. STAR was delivered in a single 25Gy fraction using volumetric modulated arc therapy. Primary endpoints included safety (adverse events within 12 months) and efficacy (reduction in VT burden, assessed by ICD-recorded anti-tachycardia pacing ATP and shocks). Results During a median follow-up of 14 months IQR 9–15, STAR was associated with a significant reduction in ICD therapies, with an average decrease of 81%. Mean ATP interventions/month dropped from 4.5±6.5 to 0.8±2.3 (p=0.029), and total ICD therapies/month decreased from 4.8±7.0 to 0.9±2.5 (p=0.032). Mild pulmonary injury and pericardial effusion occurred in 22.2% of patients. Most cases were asymptomatic; one patient (5.5%) required non-urgent pericardiocentesis. No significant changes in left ventricular function, valvular status, or coronary artery disease progression (assessed by CAD-RADS and PCAT analysis) were observed. One-year mortality was 33.3%; no deaths were directly attributable to STAR. Conclusion STAR shows promise as a safe, noninvasive option for patients with refractory VT and advanced cardiomyopathy. Larger multicenter studies are needed to confirm long-term outcomes and better define its clinical role.
Carbucicchio et al. (Fri,) reported a other. Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation reduced ICD therapies by 81% in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia, with a median follow-up of 14 months.