Key result
Among 40 candidate variables, only an abnormal lung examination, suspicion of pneumonia, and suspicion of acute pulmonary oedema had perfect inter-rater agreement.
Why the study?
Predictor variables needed to be identified to inform a future clinical decision rule for CXR ordering in patients with non-traumatic chest pain.
What clinical variables have the highest inter-rater reliability among emergency physicians for ordering a chest X-ray in adult patients with non-traumatic chest pain?
What clinical variables have the highest inter-rater reliability among emergency physicians for ordering a chest X-ray in adult patients with non-traumatic chest pain?
Abnormal lung examination, suspicion of pneumonia, and suspicion of acute pulmonary edema are the most reliable clinical predictors agreed upon by emergency physicians for ordering a chest X-ray in non-traumatic chest pain.
These variables may aid future CXR decision-rule development; leaves open prospective validation before any practice impact.
Objective We sought to identify predictor variables for a future clinical decision rule for CXR ordering in non‐traumatic chest pain. Methods Emergency Medicine Physicians were asked to select variables that would result in a CXR being ordered. Inter‐rater reliability (using Fleiss' kappa) was calculated for the most commonly agreed upon. Results Of the 40 candidate variables, 10 were most agreed upon; however, only three had perfect inter‐rater agreement and reliability. Conclusions In this study, only an abnormal lung examination, a suspicion of pneumonia or of acute pulmonary oedema had perfect inter‐rater agreement and reliability. Further research is required on a larger scale to refine and identify the optimal candidate variables for inclusion in a clinical decision rule.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joe Anthony Rotella (2026) studied this question. Among 40 candidate variables, only an abnormal lung examination, suspicion of pneumonia, and suspicion of acute pulmonary oedema had perfect inter-rater agreement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: